fuji superia 400 shot at 200

She grew up there; it was fun to explore her hometown. Your images demonstrate how versatile this film is . And for the price, compared to other films? Learn how your comment data is processed. So, will I use this film again? That was all I really needed to know. It really would be handy to find a good ISO400 film, both for when light is lower, and when I want to use smaller apertures for greater DOF. See for yourself what you like. Its a film willing to be casually shot as well as professionally scrutinized, and its the perfect emulsion for transforming new shooters into full-on photo geeks. Yeah, I like the stuff. And there is Hi Michael, thank you for your feedback. Everything we had read online had told us Superia was an incredibly flexible stock, being a 400 speed we figured it would be perfect for the uncertain lighting we Superia didjust that, and even on occasion Id makea shot that would really knock my socks off. Plenty of overexposure does wonders for this film, perhaps try shooting it at 320 or 200 and see what happens? The Superia exhibits a rather moderate reciprocity failure. lachlan_fyshDecember 21, 2009 in The Wet Darkroom: Film, Paper & Chemistry, I'm about to embark on a trip and plan to buy about 15 rolls of consumer film. Superia 200, and even more so the supposedly budget FujiColor C200 have given me far better, and far more consistent results than Superia 400. Everything we shot was shot at box speed, 400 ISO, with varying apertures and shutter speeds on a Canon F1 paired with a Minolta 28mm f2.8. It can be plain ugly relative to what the Kodak NC films or Fuji Pro S or H films deliver. The 4-pack of 24 exp. But he found that 200 had about 1 stop more latitude of underexposure, and 400 had about 1 stop more overexposure. Id memorialized that moment on analog film, rather than simply running an iPhone photo through a filter app. 9 days ago. Shooting until we wasted all our films / couldnt stand each other any more / would be frozen to death. Wowsers. Greetings. So with great light and good settings, its a dream. Close Fuji Superia Premium 400 shot at EI 400. WebFujifilm FujiColor 200 film 35mm 135-36 - 5 Pack EXP.

She grew up there; it was fun to explore her hometown. When overexposed by two or three stops, the curves don't yet cross, but they do compress heavily. I forget the exact numbers. WebMinolta XG-1 | 50mm | Fuji Superia 200. comment sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment . The 200 has lower color saturation/contrast. Have one to sell? I used it so much when I was first starting out myself, Id buy it expired at the local bargain mart, clearance bins, thrift stores, anywhere I could get it cheap and loved the look. Shooting Fujifilm Fujicolor 200 Site Title, https://blog.jimgrey.net/2022/01/24/shooting-fujifilm-fujicolor-200/, The end of FujiFILM? Its the peoples film, an emulsion that ensures that all the joys of analog shooting are available to people on even the tightest budgets. Character of days past still within memory of most people. My gaze driftedback out the window to the silhouettes of strip malls, foreclosed homes, and the occasional squad car slipping past. Color negative film in 35mm format. I usually meter for a rather yet not too dark spot in my surrounding, maybe the pavement. It will actually improve your results. Free postage . Nice job! There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! so much you can do with it. Then theres Superias 400 film speed, a jack-of-all-trades speed which works for general purpose photography, and a speed thats particularly well suited to available-light and golden hour photography. The significant difference between this, and Fuji 400H (NPH) for example, is what happens when overexposed by one, two, and three stops. Its also quite commonly held in real shops (when/if they ever open again) which gives one the rare opportunities for spontaneous choice. For me, these edges look rough and dirty and they slightly vary from frame to frame. Great photographs! But, until you become highly tuned to nuances in your pictures, the 400 will look great for portraits too. But the question still lies: from a grain/contrast point of view will I be significantly better off using 200 (possibly as 100) rather than 400 as 200 for enlargements?

Without knowing anything much about Kodak films, isn't that kind of comparing apples to oranges? Firstly, for creative stuff, or where you want to play with shadows a lot, try Lomography 100, it is what it is good at. A password reset link will be sent to you by email. Heres a sample shot of Ultramax from a Canonet GIII QL17: https://www.geekjosh.co.uk/photography/lomography-rebranded-film-guide/. I have also noticed in some overcast light it gets under exposed easily. Iced Sea | Olympus OM-2n | 50mm f1.4 | Kodak Portra 400. With Portra or CineStill 800T, I add two stops. Id try to snap a picture of something interesting every morning on my walk to the stop, but tired eyes and an uninspiring environment fought me harder than normal that day. Thanks for the tip! Its a good film. Everything we shot was shot at box speed, 400 ISO, with varying apertures and shutter speeds on a Canon F1 paired with a Minolta 28mm f2.8. Join us for weekly film photography inspiration and tutorials. I have my students run test to determine what they need to use as an ISO. Superia 200, and even more so the supposedly budget FujiColor C200 have given me far better, and far more consistent results than Superia 400. Enter your search keyword. The two 400 1/250sec at f8 with this film would give good negative for everything from direct sun to moderate shadow. Oh no! Great article! Superia is a daylight balanced, 400 speed, C-41 color negative film manufactured by our friends from the east, Fujifilm, and on the face of it the film sounds pretty average. Every shot came out awesome and I underexposed a lot of night shots that shockingly came out. I cant even remember the settings. Ive just not had very good results with it personally, found it pretty inconsistent, and even the best shots havent wowed me. I arrived at the bus stop at the exact moment the bus arrived, and took up my usual resting spot at the window. https://shootitwithfilm.com/how-to-shoot-fujifilm-superia-400 If the Valley seemed bleak and somberduring the day, it burst into magnificent color at night. Im currently working my way through black and white film stocks and its really helped me to work out what Im looking for in my images and therefore whether the film stock is able to give me that.Keep on sharing your musings! 100 Years of Leica Photography Book Review, The new Leica Summilux F1.4 ASPH, Focus down to 40cm, Leica 28mm F1.4 ASPH Summilux Lens Review, Collectors Edition? I havent tried Portra in either 160 or 400 versions. Some years ago, I once tried another Fuji film. Web64K subscribers in the fujifilm community. You can pick up some Fuji Superia 400 on Amazon here:Fujifilm Superia 400 in 35mm. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Ive shot quite a bit with Lomo 400 and I can attest to its quality, although it does leave me wanting for the sharpness other 400 speed films possess. So who knows! I can get a pack for 3 36ex for $8.95 Australian. And for that, I really like it! cheap. As far as finding out if overexposing it will help - shoot half a I used to use quite a bit of this film in an old Olympus 35RC rangefinder. I havent used it myself, but Fuji Japan markets it as being optimized for Japanese skin tone. Ive made some of my most satisfying images on Fujicolor 200. $420,000. How do u calculate the exposures for the night shots? Fujicolor 200 often renders white skin tones a little ruddier than real life, but not so much as to be unrealistic. For development and scanning I sent my roll of Fuji Superia to Carmencita Film Lab in Valencia, Spain. Its so versatile and can be used for landscapes and portraits both indoors and out. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Thanks! Free shipping . For these reasons, a good rule may be to meter for the shadows of a shot and only over-expose by a single stop. And while a seasoned pro can certainly spot the difference between Superia and these other amazing films, for most amateurs and enthusiasts, Superia looks just as sweet. Foca Focamatic. One last photo, this time from a Superia roll we had leftover, I shot this from a side window in the apartment I rented for two weeks this past November in Madrid, Spain. Josh Solomon is a freelance writer and touring bassist living in Los Angeles. This Summer I went around to all the local Wal-Marts and bought whatever they had stocked in Fuji 35mm and Im glad I did because I was able to shoot a bit more of the stuff but I didnt know at that time that Fuji had shut down their manufacturing. I use Kodak Portra films and Fuji Pro 400H. As I had wisely loaded the film in complete darkness , I was able to obtain 40 frames from the single roll. In 2019, Fuji Superia is my favourite colour film. This can be really flattering especially in high keyed, bridal photography type scenarios .
, Wedding and portraiture I've seen shot on Superia 400 featured skin tones ranging from almost jack-o-lantern orange for tanned skin to wire brush facial pink for ruddy complexions. First of all, is this normal? The superia 800 speed film I find to be grainy. Sell now. Ellinikon International Airport - Elliniko Athens Greece - 29/6/2016. https://www.flickr.com/search/?sort=interestingness-desc&view_all=1&text=lomography400. Check these out. It was all expired as well but I didnt care. Grain is by no means completely absent- its there in great enough quantity to renderimages that have the signature analog look were shooting for, but the grain isminimized enough that itnever overwhelms the image. But when I shoot regular portraits, I meter for shadows. If it's versatility you're after, then get a few rolls of Superia 800 for low light and as a substitute for 400. Ill try a couple of rolls and see how it goes. Its definitely worth another shot. What is the differnece between Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia Premium 400 and Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-Tra 400? Learn how your comment data is processed. I recently ordered some fresh rolls of Superia. Join. Give the film more light, however, and the contrast curve flattens out quickly. Here is a test shot: What I really like about the film comes out in this test shot. We found this garden shed at nearby residential house. I have not tried many other films, but this film seems like a plenty good film to me. The batch of Lomo 400 Ive just got says made in USA on the box (suggesting its Kodak), but according to the Dexter site (https://dexter.pcode.nl/) the barcode number suggests its Ferrania. Im just starting to get into film myself. "Xpro" is very popular now with young people. Shop by category. To have a little more room for exposure errors, I rated the Fuji Superia at EI 200. Im a Leica Street photographer. I love them, as they give the image an authentic look in my opinion. Fujifilm has discontinued a whole bunch of films since I returned to this hobby including, possibly, this one in the United States, replacing it with a film sourced from Kodak but given the same name. I shot a bunch of Superia 200 at box speed and it was all good. Especially, if they are rather meaningless photographs only taken to reveal subtle differences in their tones. The drive of thirty-five minutes would get me to my high school in Chatsworth, a town only differentiated from Panorama City bythe presence of hills and a slightly lower crime rate. It was Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 and was shot in a Vivitar Ultrawide and Slim clone. Opening up one stop covers deep shadow or heavy overcast.

Superia 400 can be an unexpectedly good portraiture film. I have not used much Superia 200. Rumor has it Fuji has stopped making rollfilm, at least temporarily. The floodlights of the stadium served to illuminate them perfectly. It reminds me of what film looked like in the 1990s before digital was mainstream. Before closing the film door, I stopped to inspect the film. It is similar, but different to Kodak Ektar, which also loves the reds. Great article/review Josh! Many thanks for your support.]. 125 lines/mm (At Contrast 1000:1) Overview. Gorgeous color. Missing textbooks? Thats it,the thought grabbed me. Fuji states it can handleup to two stopsand still make perfect images. Another classic stock I would compare Superia to is Portra, they are similar in their versatility and grain. Ill make sure I pick some up ASAP Josh. I took this test show of stones in the sun and in the shade to try and demonstrate it. Or sharpness, vignetting, bokeh Dont get me wrong, comparisons are really helpful. I cant get over how beautiful these creamy tungsten drenched highlights look paired with the warm green shadows. When overexposed by two or three stops, the curves don't yet cross, but they do compress heavily. $26.97 . On our way, we came across these sewage pipes and cable drum. Im returning to film photography after a long time shooting only digital and just shot a role of Superia through the X-700 (which was also my first camera back in high school) my wife got me for Fathers Day. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. If you click on a link and make a purchase, Shoot It With Film may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. Fujifilm Superia 400 Overview: Fujifilm Superia 400 is a highly versatile and easy to use 35mm film. It works best rated at 200 and metered for the shadows. Web2 x box containing 2 pcs Fujifilm Superia 200. : https://www.geekjosh.co.uk/photography/lomography-rebranded-film-guide/, Also, if Superia isnt your cup of tea, Id definitely recommend Kodak Ultramax 400. Even 2 stops over and you will be fine but no additional improvements at this point. Ive shot it successfully at EI 100, 200, and 400 with no loss of quality that I could discern. Some of this was in part due to the excellent optics in the humble Yashica (32mm f3.5 lens) thats pretty darn close to the Zeiss T3 lens (for hundreds less too). Fuji C200 was a favorite from the start of my current analog camera journey it was cheap, it was at Walmart, it looks great. Great pic of the ship!

Hands down, Superia 200 over 400: lower contrast, finer grain, reasonable saturation. Or did you The drumline scene popped with a glorious vibrancy that seemed brighter than memory. Just shot 4 rolls of 400 recently, its my go-to all-purpose color negative film and I love it. I have used fuji pro 400 h and 160 s and they are neutral toned films.

I wouldn't hesitate to use Superia 400 as an all-around film. Sorry but there's no comparison. Now I want to be completely up front, we had a pair of Arri 300 Tungsten lights that I was using to light this. Guess there are a lot of folks around stocking up Fuji products. I shot the roll in question during a photowalk with my friend Hans. A freshly burned CD that I needed to give to a friend? I happen to love color film 400 rated down to ISO 200.

The idea of routinely over exposing negative films, is a bad one. Now that Ive heaped praise onto this inexpensive color film, Im going to tell you that I prefer this films slightly slower brother, Fujicolor 100! Any pro lab with a tight C41 line shows quickly how dissimilar consumer and pro print films are.

Finally, one of Superia 400 exposed as metered.